Appropriate Laguage When Checking With an Editioer About a Peer Review

Focus and Scope

The aim of this Periodical is to promote a principled approach to research on language and linguistic communication-related concerns by encouraging enquiry into relationship between theoretical and practical studies. The journal welcomes contributions in such areas of current analysis in:

  • first, second, and foreign language educational activity and learning;
  • language in education;
  • language planning, linguistic communication testing;
  • curriculum design and development;
  • multilingualism and multilingual education;
  • discourse assay;
  • translation;
  • clinical linguistics;
  • literature and teaching; and.
  • forensic linguistics.

Section Policies

Regular Articles

Practitioner-Researcher Voices

This department publishes exercise-based articles, critical review manufactures, and reflective articles that address current problems/debates in practical linguistics from different linguistic perspectives. The length of these manufactures should be between 2,500 words and 3,500 words. The number of references should be betwixt 8 and 15 journal articles and seminal books. For the style and pitch of this article, nosotros encourage you to read the previously published articles in this journal.

Peer Review Process

The periodical operates a peer review procedure and promotes blind reviewing. The credence or rejection of manufactures volition exist decided by the editorial boards based on the review results supplied by the reviewers. In that location are no communications between authors and editors concerning the rejection conclusion. Before going to the review process, all manuscripts volition exist checked that they are free from plagiarism practise using "Turnitin" software. If there is an indication of plagiarism, the manuscript will instantly exist rejected. Authors whose papers are rejected volition be informed of the reasons for the rejection.

The editors reserve the right to suggest that the authors have their manuscripts proofread and edited past professional proofreaders, and to decline the publication of manuscripts whose authors practise not comply with the editors' suggestions.

Publication Frequency

Until January 2015, the Indonesian Journal of Practical Linguistics had been published twice a year in Jan and July. Every issue consisted of twelve articles and, therefore, every volume consisted of twenty-four articles. And so, in July 2015, the policy inverse; the journal was published twice a yr in January and July, with every result consisting of sixteen articles. This modify aimed to accommodate more quality articles for faster dissemination of knowledge, research, and practices. Since May 2017, IJAL has published three times a twelvemonth in January, May, and September,  with twenty to twenty-five manufactures per result.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open up access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. This periodical requires article processing charges (APCs). Charges will utilize afterward the manuscripts have passed a rigorous blind review process.

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statements

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

(Based on Elsevier recommendations and COPE's Best Exercise Guidelines for Journal Editors)

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The publication of an article in the peer-reviewed journals published by The Language Eye, Indonesia University of Education is process of permanent cognition comeback. Information technology is a direct reflection of the quality of the piece of work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles back up and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the deed of publishing: the author, the periodical editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society of lodge-owned or sponsored journals.

The Language Center, Indonesia University of Education takes their duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and nosotros recognise our ethical and other responsibilities.

Nosotros are committed to ensuring that advertisement, reprint or other commercial revenue has no touch on or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful to editors.

Duties of authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying information should exist represented accurately in the newspaper. A paper should comprise sufficient particular and references to permit others to replicate the piece of work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements establish unethical beliefs and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be authentic and objective, and editorial 'opinion' works should exist clearly identified as such.

Data access and retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should in any consequence be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been accordingly cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from 'passing off' another's paper every bit the writer's own newspaper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of some other's paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication

An writer should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than 1 journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. In full general, an author should not submit for consideration in some other journal a previously published paper.

Acknowledgement of sources

Proper acquittance of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported piece of work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or word with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the grade of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not exist used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

Authorship of the paper

Authorship should exist express to those who have made a meaning contribution to the formulation, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported written report. All those who have made pregnant contributions should exist listed every bit co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in sure substantive aspects of the enquiry project, they should be best-selling or listed every bit contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors accept seen and approved the final version of the newspaper and take agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and human or animal subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have whatever unusual hazards inherent in their utilize, the author must conspicuously place these in the manuscript. If the piece of work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the writer should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always exist observed.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript whatever fiscal or other substantive disharmonize of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Examples of potential conflicts of involvement which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock buying, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest phase possible.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant mistake or inaccuracy in his/her own published piece of work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or right the newspaper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant mistake, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the newspaper or provide testify to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.

Duties of editors

Publication decisions

The editor of a peer-reviewed journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the periodical should exist published, oftentimes working in conjunction with the relevant social club (for club-endemic or sponsored journals). The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers (or society officers) in making this conclusion.

Fair play

An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and whatever editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own enquiry without the express written consent of the author. Privileged data or ideas obtained through peer review must exist kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other fellow member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (perchance) institutions connected to the papers. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interest.

Copyright Discover

Authors who publish with this journal concur to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the periodical right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Artistic Commons Attribution-ShareAlike four.0 International License that allows others to share the piece of work with an acknowledgment of the work'southward authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a volume), with an acquittance of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to mail service their piece of work online (e.thou., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it tin lead to productive exchanges, likewise as earlier and greater citation of published work

Indexing and Reputation

IJAL has been indexed by Directory of Open Admission Journal (DOAJ) with green tick, EBSCO, Google Scholar, Scopus (Q2), and Science and Technology Index (SINTA i).

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Fees

To cover operational cost and decreasing fiscal back up from the academy, starting the edition of May 2021, IJAL applies commodity processing charges (APCs).

Journal Archiving

Open up Journal Systems supports the LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) organization to ensure secure and permanent preservation of your journal. You have several options for including your periodical in a LOCKSS network:

Other LOCKSS Networks

If you believe you have access to one or more of the LOCKSS networks listed here, please contact the appropriate LOCKSS Network ambassador to apply for inclusion. Completing the form beneath will allow for inclusion of your journal in those networks.No content will be preserved before yous take notified the appropriate network.

APC

We would like to inform you that starting July 2021 we will apply an Commodity Processing Charges (APCs) of USD350 to comprehend the publication services, including the costs of peer review administration and management, production of articles in PDF, and dissemination of published papers. The APC is payable when your manuscript is already accepted subsequently a blind review process, and is charged to you, your institution, or your employer. All articles published in IJAL are freely available online and open access. Readers are free to distribute, remix, transform, accommodate, and build upon the manufactures even for commercial purposes, as long every bit they credit the authors and IJAL and license their new creations under the identical terms. We are looking forward to your contribution to the journal in the upcoming problems.

barneslonts1937.blogspot.com

Source: https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/about/editorialPolicies

0 Response to "Appropriate Laguage When Checking With an Editioer About a Peer Review"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel